河道治理工程防洪堤护岸型式选择与评价——以西塔溪治理工程为例  

River governance engineering flood prevention and embankment protection shore-type selection and evaluation——Taking governance project at Xitaxi as an example

作　　者：艾利军 AI Lijun(Nanping Fujian Water Resources and Hydropower Survey and Design Co.Ltd,Nanping353000,China)

机构地区：[1]南平市富建水利水电勘察设计有限公司,福建南平353000

出　　处：《水科学与工程技术》2024年第6期68-71,共4页Water Sciences and Engineering Technology

摘　　要：以西塔溪治理工程为例,围绕河道治理工程的护岸型式选择进行研究。对埋石混凝土挡墙、生态砌块挡墙、格宾石笼挡墙的优劣进行比选,结合治理区的地质条件及治理需求,最终确定采用重力式埋石混凝土挡墙和生态砌块挡墙作为最终方案。从防护效果、生态效益、社会效益和经济效益4个方面出发,构建西塔溪护岸型式综合评价模型,对各种生态护坡技术进行评价与分析,两种挡墙方案为整治河段最优方案。对挡墙设计的稳定性进行了计算,所选挡墙满足工程稳定性要求。结果表明,不仅为西塔溪治理工程提供了可行的护岸型式选择方案,也为类似工程的设计和实施提供了参考与借鉴。This study takes the Xitapixi governance project as an example,and conducts research on the shore-type selection of watershed management projects.Compare the advantages and disadvantages of buried stone concrete gear,ecological block gear,and Gibin stone cage gear.Combined with the geological conditions and governance needs of the governance area,it was finally determined that the gravity buried stone concrete gear and ecological block stone gear wall was used as the final solution.The study also started from the four aspects of protective effects,ecological benefits,social benefits and economic benefits,and established a comprehensive evaluation model of the Xitapixi Kaifang formation form,and evaluated and analyzed various ecological slope technology.It can be seen that the two wall gear schemes are the optimal plan for the corresponding rectification river section.In addition,this article also calculates the stability of the wall design,and the results show that the selected gear to meet the requirements of the project stability.This study not only provides a feasible shore-type selection solution for the Xitapixi governance project,but also provides useful references and reference for the design and implementation of similar projects.

关 键 词：护岸型式比选 护岸设计 护岸评价 

分 类 号：TV85[水利工程—水利水电工程]