完善评审机制,提升评审质效--以国家自然科学基金委员会化学科学部“负责任、讲信誉、计贡献”评审机制试点工作为视角  

Improving the evaluation mechanism and enhancing the quality and efficiency of project review-from the perspective of the pilot work of the“responsibility,credibility,contribution”evaluation mechanism in the Department of Chemical Sciences,NSFC

作　　者：黄艳[1] 饶德伟 王领 詹世革[1] 杨俊林[1] Yan Huang;Dewei Rao;Ling Wang;Shige Zhan;Junlin Yang(The Department of Chemical Science,National Natural Science Fundation of China,Beijing 100085,China;School of Biology&Biological Engineering,South China University of Technology,Guang Zhou 510006,China)

机构地区：[1]国家自然科学基金委员会化学科学部,北京100085 [2]华南理工大学生物科学与工程学院,广州510006

出　　处：《中国科学：化学》2024年第12期2334-2347,共14页SCIENTIA SINICA Chimica

摘　　要：科学性是科学基金的根本,公正性是科学基金的生命.科学公正地完成基金项目的评审工作是提升科学基金资助效能、促进科技创新发展、助力科技体制升级的重要环节.本文介绍了国家自然科学基金委员会化学科学部2021-2023年“负责任、讲信誉、计贡献”(Responsibility,Credibility,Contribution,RCC)评审机制试点工作情况,对所采集的“负责任”和“讲信誉”相关数据进行了统计与分析,总结了阶段性工作成效与试点经验,并对今后工作提出了政策建议与实施举措.Scientificity is the bedrock of National Natural Science Fund,while fairness is its lifeblood.The scientific,fair and impartial completion of project review is a critical element in improving funding efficiency,fostering technological innovation,and advancing the upgrade of scientific system.This article introduces the pilot work of the“Responsibility,Credibility,Contribution”(RCC)evaluation mechanism in the Department of Chemical Sciences at NSFC from 2021 to 2023.It encompasses statistical analysis on data related to“responsibility”and“credibility”indicators,summarizes interim achievements and pilot experiences,and offers policy recommendations and implementation measures for future endeavors.

关 键 词：自然科学基金 项目评审 RCC 化学科学部 

分 类 号：N12[自然科学总论] O6[理学—化学]