检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南理工学院马克思主义学院
出 处:《马克思主义哲学研究》2024年第2期27-36,362,共11页Marxist Philosophical Research
基 金:2023年国家社科基金重点项目“马克思主义哲学中国化的百年历程与基本经验研究”(项目编号:23AZX001);2020年湖南省社科基金重点项目“李达史学思想研究”(项目编号:20ZDB015)。
摘 要:作为中国马克思主义史学研究的先驱者,李达与蔡和森的史学思想既存在共性,又各具个性。一方面,他们较为系统地引进了马克思主义基本原理,并将其作为分析历史问题的重要工具,推动了唯物史观在中国的传播与发展,从而促进了马克思主义史学在中国的蓬勃兴起;另一方面,他们各自的人生经历、革命实践、思想个性和理论素养的差异,导致他们在阐释、研究和传播马克思主义史学的过程中,特别是在唯物史观认知、史学研究内容和史学研究方法等方面,呈现出风格各异、特点鲜明的特征,形成了“李达式”史学和“蔡和森式”史学两种不同的治史范式。然而,他们的具体指向和价值目标却具有高度的一致性,都是为了适应中国革命斗争的需要,并在推进中国马克思主义史学的道路上殊途同归,这充分体现了马克思主义史学的基本形态与时代形态的辩证统一。深入比较李达与蔡和森史学思想的异同,对于今天推动马克思主义史学的发展具有重要的现实意义。As pioneers in the study of Chinese Marxist historiography,Li Da and Cai Hesen's historiographical ideas have both commonality and individuality.On the one hand,they systematically introduced the basic tenets of Marxism and used them as an important method for analyzing historical issues,thus promoting the development of historical materialism in China,and thus Marxist historiography flourished in China;on the other hand,because of their different life experiences,revolutionary practice,ideological personalities,and theoretical accomplishments,there were differences in the interpretation,research,and dissemination of Marxist historiography,especially in their different styles in terms of cognition of historical materialism,historical research content,and historical research methods.It has distinctive characteristics and presents two different paradigms of historical governance,the"Li Da-style"historiography and the"Cai Hesen-style"historiography,but their specific orientations and value goals are very consistent,and they are all aimed at meeting the needs of China's revolutionary struggle and have the same goal on the road of advancing Chinese Marxist historiography,which fully embodies the dialectical unity of the basic form of Marxist historiography and the form of the times.An indepth comparison of the similarities and differences between Li Da and Cai Hesen's historiographical ideas is of great practical significance for promoting the development of Marxist historiography today.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62