行政协议履约之诉判决方式研究  

Judgment Method of Administrative Agreement Performance Litigation

作　　者：陈雅菁 郭理 CHEN Yajing;GUO Li(Law School,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China)

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《邵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期46-52,共7页Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：中南大学研究生自主探索创新项目“新形势下行政执法检察监督制度体系研究”(1053320222671)。

摘　　要：行政协议履约纠纷在当下司法实践中呈现出同案不同判、高驳回率、高上诉率的普遍态势,暴露出诉判错位和胜诉判决无实质意义的不佳救济现状。其原因可能与相关立法规范存在歧义、司法主体权能受到一定限制和不佳经济形势下高财政压力等有关。对此,应首先力求以实体性履行判决回应原告合理诉请;在其他情形下正确适用驳回诉讼请求判决,适时适用补救、补偿判决,补充单用或并用赔偿判决,以充分发挥司法在解决行政争议和当事人权利救济中的重要作用。In current judicial practice,disputes over the performance of administrative agreements are generally characterized by inconsistent judgments for identical cases,high overall rejection,and ap-peal rates,which uncover a poor state of relief,including adjudications not in accordance with the ap-peal and meaningless judgments of winning a lawsuit.The reasons may be related to various factors,such as ambiguities in relevant legislative norms,limitations on the power of judicial subjects,and high financial pressure due to poor economic conditions.Therefore,the plaintiff’s reasonable claims should primarily be addressed through the substantive performance of the judgment to the greatest extent.Under other circumstances,the claim-dismissed judgment should be adopted legitimately,remedy and compen-satory judgments should be adopted in a timely manner,and single or combined compensatory judgments should be supplemented to fully utilize the important role of justice in resolving administrative disputes and relieving the rights of the parties involved.

关 键 词：行政协议 判决方式 履约之诉 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]