检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡慧馨 HU Hui-xin
机构地区:[1]北京教育学院政法系
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2024年第12期74-79,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
摘 要:中国城市基层社区腐败现象频发。社区腐败表现为:一、社区干部“官僚化”;二、重大决策权不在居民会议而在居委会;三、公共资源分配权被滥用;四,社区监督机制被虚化。社区腐败的原因主要是:一、居委会工作政社不分;二、决策体系有缺陷;三、居委会职能行政化;四、居委会双重角色有冲突。因此,塑造新的社区运行机制是当前防控社区腐败的首要环节,而构建新的社区运行机制关键在于居委会的去行政化。为社区制定“行政准入”的权力清单,分散居委会的行政权力是社区反腐的一条可行之路。Corruption in urban grassroots communities in China is frequent.Community corruption manifests as"bureaucratization"of community leaders,major decision-making power not in residents'meetings but in residents'committees,abuse of power in allocating public resources and weakening of community oversight mechanisms.The main reasons for community corruption are the failure to distinguish between government and society in the work of residents'committees,defective decision-making systems,the administrative nature of residents'committees'functions and conflicts in the dual roles of residents'committees.Therefore,shaping new community operating mechanisms is the primary step in preventing and controlling corruption in communities,and the key to building new community operating mechanisms lies in the de-administratization of residents'committees.Establishing a"administrative access"power list for communities and decentralizing the administrative power of residents'committees is a feasible path for anti-corruption in communities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7