《弘治〈贵州图经新志〉》“养龙坑”条辨伪  

Criticism of the“Yanglongkeng”Entry in Hongzhi Guizhou Tujing Xinzhi

作　　者：胡晓军[1] HU Xiao-jun(School of Liberal Arts,Guizhou University,Guiyang550025,Guizhou,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州大学文学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《贵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期42-48,共7页Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences

摘　　要：在明代贵州方志《弘治〈贵州图经新志〉》中,“贵州宣慰司.山川.养龙坑”条言此地所产龙马被明升当作贡品献给朝廷,并赐名“飞越峰”。因其内容完全抄自宋濂《龙马赞(有序)》,故此文不足为凭。但此后的贵州方志均沿袭此说。明代方志体例多袭《方舆胜览》,其体例之得失即四库馆臣提要所谓“无裨于掌故而有益于文章”。《弘治〈贵州图经新志〉》“养龙坑”之内容以文学作品的描写为信史,后世学者检阅此类方志文献时,应注意辨识真伪。Hongzhi Guizhou Tujing Xinzhi is a local chronicle of Guizhou compiled in Hongzhi's reign of Ming Dynasty,which states in the entry of“Guizhou Xuanweisi(Provincial level self-governing region)—Mountains and Rivers—Yanglongkeng”that a dragon horse bred here were presented as tribute to the imperial court and therefore was named“Feiyuefeng”by the emperor.Since this story was completely borrowed from Song Lian's Ode to the Dragon Horse(with Preface),this entry is not reliable.However,subsequent local chronicles of Guizhou all followed this view.The compilation styles of local chronicles in the Ming Dynasty mostly imitated Fangyu Shenglan.The features in the compilation of these books are just like what was described in the abstracts by the editors of Siku Quanshu,that is,“they are of no help to historical recordings but beneficial to writing”.Since this“Yanglongkeng”entry of Hongzhi Guizhou Tujing Xinzhi takes the descriptions in literary works as historical facts,later scholars should pay attention in terms of reading such kinds of local chronicles.

关 键 词：《弘治〈贵州图经新志〉》 养龙坑 宋濂 

分 类 号：K29[历史地理—历史学]