检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈兴宇 Chen Xingyu(Anhui Linhuai Gang Flood Control Engineering Management Bureau,Huoqiu237484,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽省临淮岗洪水控制工程管理局,安徽霍邱237484
出 处:《吉林水利》2025年第1期32-35,共4页Jilin Water Resources
摘 要:本文针对洪水控制工程中蓄水方案对环境的影响开展优选研究,以降低环境影响和优化工程效益为目标,采用熵权法和TOPSIS法对堤防护砌、导(截)渗工程、塌岸护砌、淹没土地、影响排涝面积和需要处理建筑物等指标进行权重计算和方案综合评价,得出各蓄水方案的环境影响综合得分。研究结果表明,评价方案3在所有蓄水方案中表现最优,综合得分指数最高,说明该方案在环境影响方面具有最佳表现,有助于实现环境影响的最低化和工程效益的最大化,丰富蓄水方案的环境影响评价方法和实践。This article focuses on the environmental impact of water storage schemes in flood control engineering and conducts optimization research,it aims to reduce environmental impact and optimize engineering benefits,using entropy weight method and TOPSIS method as the main research methods to calculate the weights of indicators such as embankment protection,seepage control engineering,collapsed bank protection,submerged land,affected drainage area,and buildings that need to be treated,and conducting comprehensive evaluations of the schemes,the environmental impact comprehensive scores of each water storage scheme are obtained.The research results show that evaluation object 3 performs the best among all water storage schemes,with the highest comprehensive score index,indicating that this scheme has the best performance in terms of environmental impact,which contributes to minimizing environmental impact and maximizing engineering benefits,enriching the methods and practices of environmental impact assessment for water storage schemes.
分 类 号:TV122[水利工程—水文学及水资源]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.91.183