《阳春集》考辨  

Textual Research on Yangchun Collection

作　　者：许骥雄 XU Ji-xiong(Humanities Teaching and Research Section of the Military and Political Basic Department,Army Academy of Armored Forces,Beijing 100071,China)

机构地区：[1]陆军装甲兵学院军政基础系,北京丰台100071

出　　处：《宝鸡文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期107-112,共6页Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：现传诸本冯延巳《阳春集》俱出自北宋陈世修所编嘉祐本,而此本互见词甚多,因此其真实性引起了后世学者的广泛质疑与争讼。通过对陈世修所作序言的分析并结合其生平事迹可知,陈世修并无作伪动机,其序言可信,而嘉祐本中词多互见重出现象或由陈氏为推美其曾外祖父而“疑以传疑”所致。此外,《阳春集》曾为冯延巳生前手定,且在南宋多有善本流传的文献记载,与死后由他人编辑且同样互见词众多的欧阳修词集相比,其可靠性更强,因此《阳春集》中与欧词互见的十余首作品应归为冯延巳所作。All the existing copies of Yangchun Collection by Feng Yansi come from the Jiayou copy by Chen Shixiu in the Northern Song Dynasty,in which there are many cross-referenced works therefore,its authenticity has been widely questioned and disputed by later scholars.Through the analysis of Chen’s preface and combined with his biography,it is clear that Chen has no motive for forgery and that his preface is credible,while the phenomenon of many cross-referenced works in the Jiayou copy may be caused by the fact that Chen“kept doubtful materials as they were”with the aim to value his great-grandfather.In addition,the Yangchun Collection was compiled by Feng himself,and there are many good copies of the record in the Southern Song Dynasty.It is more reliable than Ouyang Xiu’s poetry collection,which was edited by others after his death and had a large number of cross-referenced works.For this reason,over ten works in the Yangchun Collection that are cross referenced with Ouyang’s collection should be attributed to Feng’s works.

关 键 词：冯延巳 《阳春集》 嘉祐本 互见词 真伪 

分 类 号：I222.8[文学—中国文学]