检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:WANG Yitian
机构地区:[1]University of International of Business and Economics,Beijing,China
出 处:《US-China Law Review》2024年第9期449-457,共9页美中法律评论(英文版)
摘 要:During this revision of the Company Law,China1 has responded at the legal level to diversified shareholding structures and provided basic regulations for dual-class share structures.Compared to other regions with extensive practices in dual-class share structures,China still has much room for improvement in regulating them.Examining the pros and cons of dual-class share structures reveals their efficiency regarding voting rights and other benefits.However,it is crucial to recognize potential issues,such as increased agency costs and the possible misuse of voting rights that these structures may cause.When summarizing international regulatory approaches to dual-class share structures,we can categorize them into autonomous and central regulatory models.China tends to adopt a centralized regulatory model but should learn from the experiences of autonomous regulatory models to enhance its system.
关 键 词:dual-class structure autonomous regulating model centralized regulatory model fiduciary duty
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225