检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余庆阳[1] 蒋煜青[2] 陈绎志[1] 曹俊寿[1] 邱丽红[1] 林柏洪[1] 陈道华[1]
机构地区:[1]福建省龙岩市第一医院,364000 [2]福建中医学院
出 处:《中医正骨》2002年第11期10-12,共3页The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology
摘 要:为分析比较盘内、盘外和盘内外注射胶原酶治疗突出型腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。随机将 10 3例患者依胶原酶注射给药方法分为盘内法组 (36例 )、盘外法组 (2 8例 )和盘内外法组 (39例 )三组 ,术后通过门诊复查、信函和电话随访。结果全部患者近期总优良率 6 8.93% ,总有效率 93.2 0 % ;远期总优良率 73.79% ,总有效率 84 .4 7% ,三组间近、远期疗效比较 ,均无显著性差异(P >0 .0 5 )。认为盘内、盘外和盘内外法三种胶原酶注射法均是临床治疗突出型腰椎间盘突出症的有效方法。The purpose of the paper is to analyze and compare the clinical therapeutic effects of the intra-disk, extra-disk, and intra- and extra-disk injections of collagen enzyme on prominent lumbar intervertebral disk hernia (LIDH). One hundred and three cases were randomly divided into three groups: Group One (36 cases), Group Two (28 cases) and Group Three (39 cases), which were treated by intra-disk, extra-disk, and intra- and extra-disk methods, respectively. All the cases were postoperatively followed up by out-patient reexaminations, letters, and telephone calls. The results showed that the short-term total excellent-good and total effective rates of all the cases were 68.93 % and 93.20 %, respectively, and the long-term ones were 73.49 % and 84.47 %, respectively. The comparison of the short-term and long-term therapeutic effects of the three groups showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). It was believed that all of the three methods for the injection of collagen enzyme are the effective methods for the clinical treatment of prominent LIDH.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46