检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北农业大学植物生理研究室
出 处:《大豆科学》1992年第4期336-342,共7页Soybean Science
基 金:国家青年科学基金
摘 要:本文用盆栽的大豆和豇豆经自然干旱比较研究了二者抗旱性的方式。试验证明大豆属低水势耐旱型,豇豆属于高水势耐旱型。豇豆以其敏感的叶片蒸腾调节机制保持体内的高水势状态,在干旱下RWC和φw变化很小。大豆则以渗透调节为主,使植株在中度水分胁迫下保持一定的生长速率,严重干旱使其生长停止或死亡。结果表明,豇豆具有比大豆更强的抗旱能力。The mechanism of adaptation to water deficits of soybean and cowpea was comparatively studied by pot culture. The results showed that the nature of drought tolerance of cowpea was due to high plant water potential while soybean was with low plant water potential. The postponement of dehydration of cowpea was achieved by reducing water loss, such as decreasing stomatal conductance, lowering non-stomatal transpiration. The soybean, however, the mechanism of dehydration tolerance was mainly osmotie adjustment. As a result, the cowpea had a much higher drought-resistance than soybean did. The growth of soybean was more sensitive to water deficits than cowpea.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117