国际商事仲裁缺员仲裁庭裁决效力问题研究——马绍尔群岛第一投资公司申请承认与执行伦敦海事仲裁裁决案述评  

The Validity of Truncated Tribunal Awardsin International Commercial Arbitration :A Case Analysis of FIC v. Mawei andFISC in the Matter of Recognitionand Enforcement of an LMAA Award

作　　者：陈延忠[1] Chen Yanzhong

机构地区：[1]厦门海事法院

出　　处：《国际经济法学刊》2009年第1期109-137,共29页Journal of International Economic Law

摘　　要：缺员仲裁庭裁决的效力问题是国际公法界和国际商事仲裁界数十年来争论的焦点,至今尚未有定论。本文以马绍尔群岛第一投资公司申请承认与执行伦敦海事仲裁裁决案为例,深入剖析了围绕缺员仲裁庭裁决效力问题的'均衡说'及'效力说'的理论纷争以及国际实践的分歧,对我国法院如何看待缺员仲裁庭裁决的效力提出了详细对策建议。The validity of truncated tribunal awards has been a controversial and unsettled issue both in public international law and international commercial arbitration.This article takes the recently decided case of FIC v.Mawei and FISC in the matter of recognition and enforcement of an LMAA Award as an example to discuss the issue,explores different views and divergent practice surrounding the topic and puts forward relevant suggestions in dealing with similar issues.

关 键 词：马绍尔群岛 国际 缺员 商事 问题 效力 仲裁 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]