不同方法对采血车厢空气消毒效果的比较  

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT METHODS IN DISINFECTION OF AIR IN BLOOD-COLLECTING CAR

作　　者：王文秋[1] 孟庆梅[1] 朱永宝[1] 刘燕[1] 崔文海[2] 

机构地区：[1]山东省血液中心,济南250014 [2]山东省精神卫生中心

出　　处：《中国消毒学杂志》2002年第4期254-255,共2页Chinese Journal of Disinfection

摘　　要：采用平板沉降法采样,检测车厢空气中细菌总数与霉菌,以比较3种方法对采血车厢空气消毒的效果。结果,戊二醛熏蒸能使车厢空气达到消毒合格标准(细菌总数≤30cfu/平板,无霉菌),开始采血后能维持2.5h空气细菌总数不超标并且无霉菌;臭氧熏蒸或氯气加臭氧熏蒸均不能将霉菌全部杀灭。因此,3种方法中仅戊二醛法可用。The plate sedimentation method was used to collect sample for examining total bacteria count and fungal count in air of the car in order to compare the efficacy of 3 methods in disinfection of air in blood-collecting car. The results showed that glutaraldehyde fumigationcould attain up-to-standard disinfection of air (total bacterial count≤30 cfu/plate, nofungus) of the car and enable the air to maintain the total bacterial count not exceeding the allowable level and no fungus for 2.5 hours after beginning of blood collection. Ozone fumigation or chlorine plus ozone fumigation could not kill fungi completely. Therefore, only glutaraldehyde among the 3 methods can be used.

关 键 词：采血车厢 空气消毒 戊二醛 臭氧 比较 

分 类 号：R187[医药卫生—流行病学] R122.12[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]