检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐静[1]
出 处:《广西警官高等专科学校学报》2015年第4期75-79,共5页Journal of Guangxi Police College
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(RWYB201411)
摘 要:法院都具有一定的地方性,地方法院尤其如此。地方法院因此负有保护地方的使命,但这与用"地方保护主义"所指称的恶劣的地方保护,并不相同。实践中,所谓"地方保护主义"只涉及地方法院所审理小部分案件,不足以构成对法院基本功能与使命的指责。人们对"地方保护主义"的敏感,很多时候是原告对异地打官司不便的一种心理反应,而法院的地方保护在很大程度上是受制于地方行政权力,这才是问题的关键。The court is of some endemicity, so is the local court in particular, which, therefore, takes on the mission of local protection. However this is different from wicked local protection alleged by local protectionism.In practice, the so-called local protectionism only involves the small parts of cases the local court hears, which has no good reason to constitute a criticism of basic function and mission of the courts. People's sensitivity of the local protectionism, most of the time, represents the prosecutors' psychological response to a lawsuit away from home town. Local protection on the part of the courts, to a large extent, is subjected to the local administrative authority, which is the crux of the issue.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145