检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]黑龙江大学法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080 [2]中共黑龙江省委党校,黑龙江哈尔滨150080
出 处:《求是学刊》2002年第6期89-92,共4页Seeking Truth
摘 要:文章通过对学界关于行政许可的定义、范围、条件和本质较有代表性的几种观点的探讨 ,强调指出 :一是行政许可的定义中应强调行政许可权行使主体的特定性 ,即行政许可权操作主体的有限性 ;二是行政许可的范围中应强调禁止范围对许可范围的限制作用 ;三是行政许可的条件中应考虑到在我国的实际国情下 ,行政许可实践层面的操作可能性 ;四是对行政许可的本质的认识 。Through discussions of the several representative opinions of the definitions, scope, conditions and character of administrative permission in the academic circles, the article emphasizes that first, the definition of the administrative permission should stress the specificity of the subject of right of administrative permission, i.e. the limitation of the subject of operation for administrative permission. Second, the scope of the administrative permission should stress the restrictive role of scope of the permission on prohibitive scope. Third, the conditions of administrative permission should consider the operability of the administrative permission on the practical level under the actual circumstances in China. And forth, the understanding of the character of the administrative permission is to be defined as a choice of either social or individual interests.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28