检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院,江苏南京210016
出 处:《推进技术》2002年第6期472-476,共5页Journal of Propulsion Technology
基 金:国家"九七三"基金资助项目(2000026302)
摘 要:为了比较近壁紊流模型对旋转盘腔内流动特征模拟精度的影响,采用在核心区选用标准k-ε模型、在近壁区选用单方程和Launder-Sharma两方程两种低雷诺数模型的区域紊流模化方法,对具有径向出流的转—静盘腔和具有径向出流的共转盘腔结构的流动进行了数值计算研究。计算结果表明:在计算的两个算例中,前者采用近壁单方程模型要稍优于两方程模型,后者采用近壁两方程模型要明显优于单方程模型,因此近壁区紊流特性的处理对旋转盘腔内的流场模拟精度具有重要的影响。To investigate the effectiveness of turbulence model near wall on the flow nature inside a rotating disc cavity, the zonal modelling approach was applied for the computation of flow inside a rotor-stator disc cavity with radial outflow and a co-rotating disc cavity with radial outflow. In the core region of the cavity the standard k-e turbulence model was employed. In the near wall region two low Reynolds number turbulence models were employed, they were single equation model and Launder-Sharma two equations. The results showed that the k-e /1-eqn predictions appear to be in closer agreement with the experimental data for the ro-tor-stator case, whereas for the co-rotating case, the Launder-Sharma low Reynolds number turbulence model is obviously superior to the single equation model. The treatment of near-wall turbulent characteristics seems to be very important to the simulation accuracy.
分 类 号:V231.3[航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航推进理论与工程] V211.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222