叙事文中“数量名”短语引入话题功能强于光杆名词的原因  

Why“Num+CL+N”phrases predominate over bare nouns in topic introduction in narrative discourse

作　　者：王红旗[1] 程妍超 WANG Hongqi;CHENG Yanchao

机构地区：[1]南开大学文学院 [2]天津师范大学文学院

出　　处：《世界汉语教学》2025年第1期9-22,共14页Chinese Teaching in the World

基　　金：南开大学亚洲中心2023年度“人文社科领域研究”(AS2309)项目资助。

摘　　要：叙事文重要的话题倾向于“数量名”短语引入,光杆普通名词极少引入重要的话题,这两种体词性词语引入话题功能的差异是其指称性质造成的。光杆普通名词是类指的,进入特定的句子后就强烈地倾向于引入人知识范围内的实体,即已知的实体,这些实体因为缺乏超常性,极少成为重要的话题;“数量名”短语是客体指的,因为数量词具有个体化、具体化的作用,“数量名”短语在特定语境的句子中可引入并且凸显超出人知识范围的实体,即未知的实体,其中有些实体是重要的话题。In narrative discourse,important topics are predominantly introduced by“Num+CL+N”phrases rather than bare nouns.This functional distinction in topic introduction between these two types of nominal phrases arises from their referential characteristics.Isolated bare nouns are kind-referring.When they enter context-specific sentences,they are strongly inclined to introduce entities within the scope of human knowledge,namely known entities,which rarely become important topics because of their lack of supernormality.Conversely,“Num+CL+N”phrases are object-referring.Due to the individuating and concretizing effects of“Num+CL”,“Num+CL+N”phrases in contextspecific sentences can introduce and highlight entities beyond the scope of human knowledge,namely unknown entities,some of which may constitute important topics.

关 键 词：“数量名”短语 光杆普通名词 话题 话题性 实体 

分 类 号：H146.3[语言文字—汉语]