中文版惊奇能力量表的信度效度检验  

Reliability and Validity Assessment of Chinese Version of Capacity for Wonder Scale

作　　者：黄露仪 张秀松 林国耀[1] HUANG Luyi;ZHANG Xiusong;LIN Guoyao(Institute of Applied Psychology,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou 363000,China)

机构地区：[1]闽南师范大学教育与心理学院,漳州363000

出　　处：《心理学通讯》2024年第3期185-191,共7页Psychological Communications

摘　　要：目的:翻译Geller等编制的惊奇能力量表(Capacity for Wonder Scale,CfW),并在中国大学生中进行信度效度和跨性别等值检验。方法:通过方便抽样,对815名大学生施测。对中文版CfW进行项目分析、信度分析和跨性别等值性测验,选取同理心量表(Empathy Scale)和人际好奇量表(Interpersonal Curiosity Questionnaire,ICQ)作为效标。结果:(1)中文版CfW的12个项目区分度良好,各项目与总分的相关系数为0.560~0.674;(2)验证性因素分析显示,两因子结构模型拟合良好(RMSEA=0.074,CFI=0.896,TLI=0.871,SRMR=0.056)(3)中文版CfW信度较好,Cronbach’sα系数为0.832,四周后的重测信度为0.789;(4)惊奇能力与同理心、人际好奇均呈显著正相关。结论:中文版CfW具有良好的信度和效度,可作为我国大学生惊奇能力的测量工具。Objective:To translate the Capacity for Wonder Scale(CfW)developed by Geller et al.,and to test its reliability,validity,and gender invariance among Chinese college students.Methods:Using convenience sampling,815 college students were surveyed.Item analysis,reliability analysis,and tests for gender invariance were conducted on the Chinese version of the CfW.The Empathy Scale and the Interpersonal Curiosity Questionnaire(ICQ)were used as validity indicators.Results:(1)The twelve items of the Chinese version of the CfW had good discriminant validity,with itemtotal correlations ranging from 0.560 to 0.674.(2)The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the twofactor model had a good fit(RMSEA=0.074,CFI=0.896,TLI=0.871,SRMR=0.056).(3)The Chinese version of the CfW had good reliability,with a Cronbach’sαcoefficient of 0.832 and a test-retest reliability of 0.789 after four weeks.(4)The capacity for wonder was significantly positively correlated with empathy and interpersonal curiosity.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the CfW has good reliability and validity,and it can be used as a tool to measure the capacity for wonder among Chinese college students.

关 键 词：惊奇能力 信度 效度 跨性别等值 

分 类 号：TP3[自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]