“銘文重合辨偽法”補説——以兩組春秋金文爲例  

Supplementary Discussion on the Method of Discernment of Authenticity by Coinciding Inscriptions:Taking Two Groups of Bronze Inscriptions from the Spring and Autumn Period as Examples

作　　者：葛亮 Ge Liang

机构地区：[1]上海博物館 [2]復旦大學出土文獻與古文字研究中心/“古文字與中華文明傳承發展工程”協同攻關創新平臺,上海200003

出　　处：《出土文献综合研究集刊》2024年第2期29-42,共14页

基　　金：教育部重大項目“基於資料庫技術的殷商甲骨刻辭事類排譜、整理與研究”(22JZD036)的階段性成果。

摘　　要：作爲判别僞銘或重複著録的簡明方式,“銘文重合辨僞法”不但適用於春秋之前、整篇金文的比對,對於春秋以後、非整篇金文的比對也有重要參考價值。在非考古發掘的傳世品中,有不少略似“全銘模”“單字模”“複合模”製成的銘文,仍能以重合法判定爲僞銘,但需要綜合器形圖像、新舊著録等各方面材料作具體分析。As a concise way to distinguish fake inscriptions or repeated inclusion,the method of discernment of authenticity by coinciding inscriptions does not only apply to the comparison of the complete inscriptions before the Spring and Autumn period,but also has important reference value for the comparison of incomplete inscriptions after the Spring and Autumn period.Among the handed down bronzes that were not archaeologically excavated,there are many inscriptions cast seemingly in a“full inscription mould”,“single character mould”or“compound mould”,which can still be judged as fake inscriptions by coinciding inscriptions,but it requires specific analysis while synthesizing the images of bronze inscriptions and old and new inclusions in the compilations.

关 键 词：金文 辨僞 春秋時代 

分 类 号：K87[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]