检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余欣然 Yu Xinran(School of Cyber Science and Engineering,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072)
出 处:《西部学刊》2025年第2期42-45,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:随着数字经济的不断发展,超大型数字平台试图通过双轮垄断,将轴心市场的垄断地位拓展延伸至其他市场,其所带来的市场支配地位的“加速累积”效应可能会压制创新,同时可能损害消费者福利,并带来数据集中、产业集中、舆论集中等风险。然而,传统的垄断行为规制路径在适用时通常会出现相关市场界定困难、垄断行为“强制性”认定标准难以适用、经营者集中申报标准失灵等困境,无法应对双轮垄断所带来的潜在“结构性障碍”,建议引入事前监管工具,在完善数字市场竞争分析理论的基础上,树立全链条的市场监管理念,推进平台分类分级,根据类型和等级,细化不同的监管强度和监管手段,从而对双轮垄断进行有效规制,从源头避免其负面影响。With the continuous development of digital economy,super-large digital platforms are attempting to extend their monopoly in core markets into adjacent markets through a dual-monopoly strategy.This results in an“accelerated accumulation”of market dominance,which may suppress innovation,harm consumer welfare,and lead to risks such as data concentration,industrial consolidation,and media control.However,traditional antitrust regulatory approaches face challenges in this context,including difficulties in defining relevant markets,the inapplicability of“coercive”criteria for monopolistic behaviors,and the failure of merger notification standards to address dual-monopoly-related issues.These limitations prevent adequate response to the potential“structural barriers”created by dual-monopolies.Based on an analysis of these challenges,this paper proposes the introduction of ex ante regulatory tools.It advocates for refining competition analysis theories in digital markets,establishing a full-chain regulatory mindset,and advancing the classification and tiering of platforms.By tailoring the regulatory intensity and methods according to platform type and tier,this approach aims to effectively regulate dual-monopolies and mitigate their negative impacts from the outset.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63