小切口面部除皱术联合埋线提升应用于面部年轻化的临床效果评价  

Clinical effect of small incision facial wrinkle removal combined with thread embedding for enhancing facial rejuvenation

作　　者：王进 王雪山 马艳 陈德广 WANG Jin;WANG Xueshan;MA Yan;CHEN Deguang(Burn plastic and cosmetic surgery,Suqian hospital of nanjing drum tower hospital group,Jiangsu Province,223800,China;Burn plastic and cosmetic surgery,Xuzhou medical University Affiliated Suqian hospital,Jiangsu Province,223800,China)

机构地区：[1]南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁医院烧伤整形美容外科,江苏宿迁223800 [2]徐州医科大学附属宿迁医院烧伤整形美容外科,江苏宿迁221004

出　　处：《中国医疗美容》2024年第12期23-26,共4页China Medical Cosmetology

摘　　要：目的探讨小切口面部除皱术联合埋线提升应用于面部年轻化的临床效果。方法选取2022年1月至2024年8月间在南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁医院接受面部年轻化治疗的100例患者,按治疗方法不同分成对照组和研究组,每组50例,对照组患者采用小切口面部除皱术,研究组患者采用小切口面部除皱术联合埋线提升技术,术后1个月比较两组患者的面部年轻化优良率、面部整形美容评分、面部定量指标、不良反应、患者的非常满意度。结果对照组患者的面部年轻化优良率为80.00%(40/50),研究组为94.00%(47/50),研究组患者高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组患者的面部整形美容评价量表(Face-Q)评分为(83.19±6.40)分,研究组为(86.37±6.73)分,研究组评分高于对照组(P<0.05);对照组患者的双侧颧点间距为(16.64±0.28)cm、瞳孔点至鼻唇沟与瞳孔垂线交点距离为(8.25±0.13)cm,研究组分别为(17.03±0.30)cm、(8.08±0.12)cm,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者的ABC弧度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组患者的不良反应发生率为6.00%(3/50),研究组为10.00%(5/50),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组患者的非常满意度为24.00%(12/50),研究组为46.00%(23/50),显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论小切口面部除皱术联合埋线提升应用于面部年轻化,有利于改善面部年轻化和整形美容效果,优化面部定量指标,提高患者的治疗满意度。Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of small incision facial wrinkle removal combined with thread embedding for enhancing facial rejuvenation.Methods 100 patients received treatment in Suqian hospital of nanjing drum tower hospital hospital were divided into two groups according to different treatment methods.The control group underwent small incision facial wrinkle removal surgery,while the study group underwent small incision facial wrinkle removal surgery combined with buried thread lifting technology.One month after surgery,the facial rejuvenation effects of the two groups were compared.Results The excellent rate of facial rejuvenation in the control group was 80.00%(40/50),while the study group was 94.00%(47/50),significantly higher(P<0.05);The Face-Q score of the control group was(83.19±6.40)points,while the study group was(86.37±6.73)points,significantly higher(P<0.05);the distance between the bilateral zygomatic points of the control group was(16.64±0.28)cm,and the distance from the pupil point to the intersection of the nasolabial groove and the pupil perpendicular was(8.25±0.13)cm.The study group had(17.03±0.30)cm and(8.08±0.12)cm,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The difference is not statistically significant in the ABC curvature between the two groups(P>0.05);The incidence of adverse reactions of the control group was 6.00%(3/50),while the study group was 10.00%(5/50),the difference is not statistically significant(P>0.05);The satisfaction rate of the control group patients was 24.00%(12/50),while the study group was 46.00%(23/50),significantly higher(P<0.05).Conclusions The combination of small incision facial wrinkle removal surgery and buried thread lifting is beneficial for improving facial rejuvenation and cosmetic effects,optimizing facial quantitative indicators,and increasing patient satisfaction.

关 键 词：小切口面部除皱术 埋线提升 面部年轻化 Face-Q 面部年轻化优良率 不良反应 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]