检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:包康赟 Bao Kangyun
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院
出 处:《财经法学》2025年第1期189-208,共20页Law and Economy
基 金:“国家资助博士后研究人员计划”资助项目(GZC20231223);2024年度法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“高水平开放背景下跨境金融监管的理论与机制研究”(24SFB3030)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:欧盟制定的《反经济胁迫条例》通过“经济胁迫”概念将第三国的合法经贸措施非法化,并试图通过反应机制与行动流程实现消极防御与竞争博弈的双重目标。该条例本质上是欧盟创设的一种兼具“制裁”与“反制裁”性质的新型法律工具,在国际投资和贸易条约以及相关习惯国际法上的合法性都存疑。鉴于该条例的实施可能会对中国企业造成负面影响进而触发我国的反制裁法律制度,我国应从提升企业应对能力、寻求司法救济、完善反制裁体系、参与构建国际规则及话语等四个维度统筹应对条例潜在的不利影响,积极维护我国的主权、安全和发展利益。The EU's Anti-Coercion Instrument tends to designate legitimate trade and economic measures taken by third countries as illegal under the concept of“economic coercion.”By establishing response mechanisms and operational processes,the Instrument aims to achieve both passive defense and competitive attack.Essentially,this instrument represents a novel legal tool created by the EU,combining elements of“sanction”and“counter-sanction,”whose legality remains questionable under international investment and trade treaties and relevant customary international law.Given the potential adverse impacts on Chinese enterprises that may trigger counter-sanction mechanisms,China should take a comprehensive approach to address the potential negative effects.Recommended measures include strengthening corporate resilience,seeking judicial relief,enhancing the counter-sanction framework,and actively engaging in the formation of international rules to protect China's developmental interests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38