论行政处罚裁量自动化中逸脱机制的适用  

On the Application of the Escape Mechanism in the Automation of Administrative Penalty Discretion

作　　者：王春业[1] 张天姿 Wang Chunye;Zhang Tianzi(Hohai University,Nanjing Jiangsu 211100)

机构地区：[1]河海大学,江苏南京211100

出　　处：《天津行政学院学报》2025年第1期85-95,共11页Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“我国法治政府数字化建设研究”(22BFX033)。

摘　　要：自动化行政处罚背景下的裁量发生了深刻的变化。行政处罚裁量自动化的应用提升了处罚的效率和客观性,但其“一刀切”的裁量模式导致了行政裁量僵化的现象,这违背了行政裁量的初衷。逸脱机制在破解裁量僵化的问题上发挥着积极作用,为在自动化裁量中探寻逸脱机制适用的路径提供了可能。构建逸脱机制需要在制度规则层面制定逸脱规范、划定逸脱范围、明确逸脱规则、公开逸脱规范,在实践运行层面规范启动主体和适用条件,在事后层面落实备案、更新数据、责任追究等保障手段。The discretion in the context of automated administrative penalty has undergone profound changes.The application of automated administrative penalty discretion improves the efficiency and objectivity of punishment,but its“one size fits all”discretion model leads to the phenomenon of rigid administrative discretion,which goes against the original intention of administrative discretion.The escape mechanism plays a positive role in solving the problem of rigid discretion,which provides the possibility of exploring the applicable path of escape mechanism in automated discretion.Constructing an escape mechanism requires the formulation of escape norms,delimitation of escape scope,clarification of escape rules,and disclosure of escape norms at the institutional and regulatory level.In terms of practical operation,it is necessary to standardize the initiation subject and applicable conditions.At the post event level,it is necessary to implement safeguard measures such as filing,updating data,and accountability.

关 键 词：行政处罚裁量 自动化行政 逸脱 公平正义 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]