发掘本土资源,辩证“性别”有别——读李小江《史学的性别》  

An Exploration of Indigenous Resources and Gender Differences:Reading The Gender of Historiography by Li Xiaojiang

作　　者：康正果 KANG Zheng-guo

机构地区：[1]不详

出　　处：《山东女子学院学报》2025年第1期72-78,共7页Journal of Shandong Women's University

摘　　要：《史学的性别》是一部书评集,立论基于两个要点:一是男女两性的社会性别基于各自的生理性别;二是不同的性别制度基于各自的地缘环境。通过与所评之书作者的对话,首先厘定了华夏语境中“别男女”的性别秩序,及其男外女内和男耕女织的社会分工,进而详析妇女“三从”的性别制度何以得受父权制荫庇,女性的弱势身份在传统宗法社会中何以反比男人更易幸存;同时剖析男性中心的史书如何编造“红颜祸水”的故事,并特别赞赏边缘文人编著的类书所记录的妇女创造的物质文明。This collection of book reviews is based on two main points:first,the gender of men and women is based on their biological sex,and second,gender systems can be different according to their geographical environments.Through dialogues with the authors of the books reviewed,Li Xiaojiang first defines the gender order of“differentiation between men and women”in the Chinese context,and the social division of labor between men working outside and women working at home,such as men working in the farm and women weaving indoors.Then,the author analyzes in detail why the traditional gender system of“three obediences”for women was protected by patriarchy,and why their vulnerable identities made them easier to survive than men in a pre-modern Chinese society.At the same time,the author analyzes how male-centered historical books have fabricated stories of“femme fatale”.She also praises the women’s encyclopedia compiled by the marginalized literati in Ming-Qing China recording the material civilization created by women.

关 键 词：性别 本土性 性别制度 女性文献史观 

分 类 号：K061[历史地理—历史学]