恢复性司法下微罪治理的理论反思  

Theoretical Reflection on Microcrime Management Under Restorative Justice

作　　者：周树超 苦打哈 ZHOU Shuchao;KU Daha

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院 [2]西昌市人民检察院

出　　处：《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第6期60-73,共14页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：四川省哲学社会科学规划项目“法治四川”专项课题“轻罪治理现代化中的刑法解释论体系建构研究”(SC24FZ024);四川省犯罪防控研究中心项目“轻罪案件的刑事一体化治理研究”(FZFK23-06)。

摘　　要：近年来,我国微罪入刑呈扩张趋势,以国家本位主义刑法观和报应刑为指导的微罪治理路径难以有效应对司法实践。而实现对传统刑罚观的扬弃、以恢复性正义为核心价值的恢复性司法为微罪治理提供了新思路:一方面,恢复性正义与微罪治理理念相契合;另一方面,恢复性司法所追求的当事人主义有助于微罪犯罪控制。在恢复性司法下构建我国微罪治理路径,立法层面要赋予检察机关微罪案件适度调解权;司法层面则扩大微罪案件酌定不起诉适用范围、构建微罪案件附条件不起诉制度;还需完善人民调解制度、新设社会服务刑,健全恢复性司法配套制度。In recent years,the punishment of microcrimes has been expanding in our country.It is difficult to deal with the judicial practice effectively with the treatment path of microcrimes guided by the view of state-oriented criminal law and retributive punishment.The restorative justice,which realizes the subrication of the traditional penalty view and takes restorative justice as the core value,provides a new way of thinking for microcrime governance.On the one hand,restorative justice and microcrime governance are in accord with each other.On the other hand,the litigant doctrine pursued by restorative justice is helpful to microcrime control.Under restorative justice,the path of microcrime management in our country should be constructed,and the procuratorial organs should be given moderate mediation rights in microcrime cases at the legislative level.At the judicial level,the application scope of discretionary non-prosecution in micro crime cases is expanded,and the system of conditional non-prosecution in micro crime cases is constructed.It is also necessary to improve the people's mediation system,establish a new social service penalty,and improve the supporting system of restorative justice.

关 键 词：恢复性司法 微罪 调解权 酌定不起诉 附条件不起诉 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]