“龙学”史上的一次飞跃——读戚良德教授《文论巨典——〈文心雕龙〉与中国文化》  

A Big Leap in the History of“The Studies on Wen Xin Diao Long”——After Reading Mr.QiLiangde The Giant Classic of Literary Theory:Wen Xin Diao Long and Chinese Culture

作　　者：朱文民 Zhu Wenmin(Juxian Institute for Wen Xin Diao Long Research,Ju County,Shandong,276599)

机构地区：[1]山东莒县刘勰文心雕龙研究所,山东莒县276599

出　　处：《语文学刊》2024年第6期1-13,共13页Journal of Language and Literature Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“《文心雕龙》汇释及百年‘龙学’学案”(17ZDA253)阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：多数学者认为《文心雕龙》是一部文学理论专著,戚良德教授则认为是一部孔门四教之一的文化教科书。但是,在反驳“文章学专著”的时候,却没有把“文章”的含义看成是随着时代的变化而变化的。对于创作论的总纲问题,大多学者认为《神思》篇是创作论的总纲,而戚教授则认为《情采》篇是创作论的总纲;戚教授认为,刘勰的思想渊源是儒释道玄,但非等量齐观。这比早年主张刘勰思想的主体是儒或佛来说全面多了,尤其他认为《周易》是其思想之根本,这就抓住了矛盾的主要方面。戚教授列出专章从“心”“文”“言”三个方面论述了《文心雕龙》之美学。这些诸多问题的提出,无疑是一次学术超越。Senior scholars think Wen Xin Diao Long is a monograph of literary theory,but Mr.Qi think it's a cultural textbook of one of Confucius'four teachings.But when refuting the“monograph on the study of essay”,the meaning of“essay”is not seen as changing with the times.For the problems of general program,senior scholars believes the chapter“Shensi”is the general program,but Mr.Qi believes the chapter“Qingcai”is the right one.Mr.Qi thinks that Liu Xie's ideological origins are from Confucianism,Buddhism,Taoism,and mysticism,but they should not be treated equally,Which is much more comprenhensive than the viewpoint proposed in the early years that the main part of Liu Xie's ideology is Confucianism or Buddhism,especially believing that“the Book of Changes”is the basis of his thinking,which captures the main aspect of the contradiction.The author use specialized chapters to discuss the aesthetic of Wen Xin Diao Long from the three aspect,“mind”,“writing”,“speaking”.All these problems pointed out is definitely a leap over senior scholars.

关 键 词：文心雕龙 性质 总纲 思想渊源 美学 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]