检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫昆 龚汉芳 高峰[1] Yan Kun;Gong Hanfang;Gao Feng(School of Materials Science and Engineering,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing,100124)
机构地区:[1]北京工业大学材料科学与工程学院,北京100124
出 处:《当代化工研究》2024年第23期76-78,共3页Modern Chemical Research
基 金:科技部国家重点研发计划“高性能铝合金高效制备与加工关键技术研究”(项目编号:2021YFB3700901/2)。
摘 要:回收废铝易拉罐生产新铝制易拉罐材料可以有效减少碳排放,因此基于生命周期评价方法分析了铝制易拉罐罐体材料的碳足迹,并使用Cut-off和CFF循环分配方法解析再生产品的碳排放构成。研究发现,使用原铝生产的铝制易拉罐罐体材料碳排放显著高于回收铝罐的碳排放,且主要来自原铝生产过程。Cut-off方法计算的碳排放为原生产品20705kgCO_(2)eq/t、再生产品6040kgCO_(2)eq/t,而CFF方法计算的碳排放为原生产品10146kgCO_(2)eq/t、再生产品8093kgCO_(2)eq/t,表明CFF方法提供了更科学的循环分配依据,能更准确反映环境责任。Recycling waste aluminum cans to produce new materials can effectively reduce carbon emissions.Therefore,the carbon footprint of aluminum can body materials was analyzed based on life cycle assessment method,and the carbon emission composition of recycled products was analyzed by Cut-off and CFF cycle allocation methods.The results show that carbon emissions from aluminum cans made with primary aluminum are much higher than those made with recycled aluminum,primarily due to the primary aluminum production process.The Cut-off method calculates emissions of 20705 kgCO_(2)eq/t for primary aluminum and 6040 kgCO_(2)eq/t for recycled aluminum,while the CFF method calculates 10146 kgCO_(2)eq/t for primary aluminum and 8093 kgCO_(2)eq/t for recycled aluminum.The CFF method provides a more accurate reflection of environmental responsibility.
分 类 号:TB31[一般工业技术—材料科学与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15