检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:严柯 Yan Ke(CNOOC Oilfield Technology Division,Korla 841000)
机构地区:[1]中海油服油田技术事业部陆地作业公司,新疆库尔勒841000
出 处:《石化技术》2024年第12期111-113,共3页Petrochemical Industry Technology
摘 要:随钻测井技术以其实时性和高精度受到广泛关注,能够提供井下岩性、含油气性等详尽信息。电缆测井技术则因其适用范围广、成本较低而备受青睐,能够在井下环境复杂情况下提供可靠数据。通过对比两者在数据采集、解释效率、适用环境等方面的差异,发现随钻测井技术在高温高压井、水平井等特殊条件下具备独特优势,而电缆测井技术则在传统垂直井中表现突出。The logging while drilling technology has received widespread attention for its real-time and highprecision performance,which can provide detailed information on downhole lithology,oil and gas content,and other factors.Cable logging technology is highly favored due to its wide applicability and low cost,and can provide reliable data in complex underground environments.This article compares the differences between the two in terms of data collection,interpretation efficiency,and applicable environment,and finds that logging while drilling technology has unique advantages in special conditions such as high temperature and high pressure wells and horizontal wells,while cable logging technology performs outstandingly in traditional vertical wells.
分 类 号:TE3[石油与天然气工程—油气田开发工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222