检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李文学 Li Wenxue(Public Security Bureau of Jining City,Shandong Province,Jining,Shandong 272100)
出 处:《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2024年第4期38-45,共8页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
摘 要:公民监督权实践路径研究以信访制度改革为视角,以公民监督权与信访权的辩证关系为着力点,对监督权实践乱象、成因、信访制度改革方案及实践效果进行理论研究和实证分析,认为在现行宪法体制下,信访制度的位置与功能发生了严重的错位,形成对监督权配套的法律制度的弱化和冲击,甚或取代。因此,应精准定位信访制度的辅助性位置,发挥其补充性功能,完善提升公民监督权配套的法律制度,使其预设的程序和机制成为监督权行使的主要实践路径。From the perspective of the reform of the petition system,and focusing on the dialectical relationship between the right of citizen supervision and the right to petition,this paper conducts theoretical research and empirical analysis on the chaos and causes of the practice of the right of supervision,the reform plan of the petition system and the practical effect,and believes that under the current constitutional system,the position and function of the petition system have been seriously misplaced,which has weakened and impacted the legal system supporting the right of supervision,or even replaced it.Therefore,it is necessary to accurately locate the auxiliary position of the petition system,give full play to its supplementary function,improve and improve the supporting legal system for citizens’right to supervise,and make its preset procedures and mechanisms the main practical path for the exercise of supervision power.
分 类 号:DF2[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.22.238