“部分篡改型”虚假诉讼行为入罪研究  

A Study on the Criminalization of“Partially Falsified”False Litigation

作　　者：罗苟新[1] 刘兵 任楚寒 Luo Gou xin;Liu Bing;Ren Chuhan(China West Normal University,Nanchong,Sichuan 637000;Gaoping District People’s Procuratorate of Nanchong,Nanchong,Sichuan 637000)

机构地区：[1]西华师范大学,四川南充637000 [2]南充市高坪区人民检察院,四川南充637000

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2024年第4期55-60,共6页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

基　　金：四川省社科重点基地“纠纷解决与司法改革研究中心”2023年度重点项目“基层社会纠纷解决与治理现代化研究”(2023DJKTb3)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(九)》明确将虚假诉讼行为纳入刑法打击范畴,但针对“部分篡改型”虚假诉讼行为的罪与非罪,实践中类案不同判的问题仍比较突出。为实现法律效果与社会效果的统一,从刑法入罪原意解读“部分篡改”归类于主观“捏造”,并根据“部分篡改型”虚假诉讼行为侵害司法秩序和他人合法权益的客观情况,设置“数额加比例”的入罪标准提高罪名适用的准确性,从行为犯、结果犯两个层面考量“部分篡改型”虚假诉讼行为的既遂,更利于司法公正适用法律。The Criminal Law Amendment(IX)explicitly includes false litigation behavior in the scope of criminal punishment,but the problem of different judgments on the crime or non-crime of“partially altered”false litigation behavior in practice is still quite prominent.In order to achieve the unity of legal and social effects,the“partially altered”should be classified as subjective“fabrication”from the perspective of the original intent of criminal liability,and an entry-of-crime standard based on the objective situation of infringing judicial order and others’legitimate rights by“partially altered”false litigation behavior should be set to enhance the accuracy of the crime name application.It is more conducive to judicial justice to consider the completion of“partially altered”false litigation behavior from both the behavioral crime and result crime levels.

关 键 词：虚假诉讼罪 “部分篡改型” 虚假诉讼行为 捏造 

分 类 号：DF62[政治法律—刑法学]