论对《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》第1条第1款b项保留的效果  

On the Effects of Reservation to Article 1(1)(b)of the CISG

作　　者：韩若琦 Han Ruoqi(Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2024年第4期93-100,共8页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

摘　　要：《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》第1条第1款b项规定了《公约》的“间接适用”,其目的在于扩大其适用范围。如果缔约国根据第95条提出保留,那么保留国将不受第1条第1款b项的约束,从而使保留国能够更多适用其国内合同相关法律。然而,有关b项保留的效果的解读,即b项的适用应以法院地国是否保留为准,还是应以准据法国是否保留为准,目前理论和实践中存在着争议。从条文的文义、体系与目的的解释等角度分析表明,“法院地国标准”更符合《公约》立法本意和条文逻辑,从而为这一问题提供了更为合理的阐释。Article 1(1)(b)of The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods(CISG),which provides for the“indirect application”of the convention,is intended to broaden its scope of application.Through a reservation under Article 95,the reservation State will not be bound by Article 1(1)(b),thereby enabling the reservation increase the application of its other domestic contract law.Nevertheless,the interpretation of the effects of this reservation,i.e.whether the reservation in subparagraph(b)is the rule of the forum State or the rule of the State to which the applicable law belongs,is currently the subject of controversy in legal theory and practice.An analysis from the perspective of the textual,systemic and purposive interpretation of the provision shows that the“forum State criterion”is more in line with the legislative intent of the Convention and the logic of the provision,providing a more rational interpretation of the issue.

关 键 词：《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》 条约适用 条约保留 国际私法 准据法 

分 类 号：DF961[政治法律—国际法学]