检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡晨光 邹浩 CAI Chenguang;ZOU Hao(School of Accounting,Hunan University of Finance and Economics,Changsha 410205,China;School of Business Administration,Hunan University of Finance and Economics,Changsha 410205,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南财政经济学院会计学院,湖南长沙410205 [2]湖南财政经济学院工商管理学院,湖南长沙410205
出 处:《工业工程》2024年第6期51-58,共8页Industrial Engineering Journal
基 金:湖南省社会科学基金资助项目(19YBQ113)。
摘 要:针对属性权重未知的重大民生决策事项,提出了一种基于公众双重评价的多属性大群体决策方法。首先,根据公众给出的双重评价信息确定各方案的属性值和整体表现情况。然后分别计算各方案属性值与认可度之间、属性值与非认可度之间的关联水平,根据两类关联度测度结果确定属性权重的取值区间。以所有方案属性值的信息离差度最小化为目标构建优化模型确定属性权重。利用TOPSIS法对方案进行排序,确定最优方案。最后通过算例对本文提出的方法进行验证。根据算例验证结果可知,本文提出的方法可以将公众评价信息融入决策活动之中,以此为依据确定相关决策信息和属性权重,使得决策结果能够充分反映民意,确保决策的有效性。For decision-making matters of major public livelihood with unknown attribute weights,a multi-attribute large group decision-making method based on public dual valuation is proposed.Firstly,attribute values and overall performance over different alternatives are determined based on the dual evaluation given by the public.Secondly,two kinds of correlation degrees are calculated separately:one is the correlation degree between attribute values and approval ratings,the other is the correlation degree between attribute values and non-approval ratings.According to the two measurement results of correlation degrees,the interval of attribute weights is determined.Thirdly,an optimization model is established with the objective of minimizing attribute deviations over all alternatives to obtain the attribute weights.The TOPSIS method is used to sort the alternatives and determine the optimal one.Finally,a numerical example is given to verify the proposed method in this paper.Verification results of the numerical example indicate that the method proposed in this paper can integrate public evaluation information into the decision-making process,which determines relevant decision-making information and attribute weights accordingly,ensuring that the decision results can fully reflect public opinions and guaranteeing decision effectiveness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198