检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢孟祥 Xie Mengxiang
机构地区:[1]河南财政金融学院法学院,河南郑州451464
出 处:《中州学刊》2025年第1期57-64,共8页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
摘 要:当前,由发达国家长期主导的、居于主流地位的可持续贸易理论存在较大缺陷,它割裂了国际贸易与环境实践中整体主义与个体主义的关系,忽视“当代人”是国际贸易与环境活动的主要参与者,未能反映国际贸易的互惠特性,在国际贸易与环境实践中将“代际公平”放在比“代内公平”更为优先的地位,建成了一整套符合发达国家利益的国际贸易与环境制度。在新的国际形势下,我国需要联合其他发展中国家,采用互惠理论进一步优化可持续贸易理论,形成理论体系融贯、内容公平合理、利益均衡的国际贸易与环境协调机制,打破发达国家对国际贸易与环境问题的理论垄断与制度垄断。At present,the sustainable trade theory that has long been dominated by developed countries and occupies a mainstream position has prominent flaws.It separates the relationship between holism and individualism in international trade and environmental practice,ignores that“contemporary people”are the main participants in international trade and environmental activities,and fails to reflect the reciprocal characteristics of international trade.In international trade and environmental practice,“intergenerational fairness”is given priority over“intragenerational fairness”,and a complete set of international trade and environmental systems that are in line with the interests of developed countries has been established.In the new international situation,China needs to work with other developing countries to further optimize sustainable trade theory through the theory of reciprocity,and form an international trade and environmental coordination mechanism that is integrated in theoretical system,fair and reasonable in content,and balanced in interests,breaking the theoretical and institutional monopolies of developed countries on international trade and environmental issues.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.212