检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童敏[1] Tong Min
机构地区:[1]厦门大学社会与人类学院,福建厦门361005
出 处:《中州学刊》2025年第1期74-81,共8页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大专项项目“中国式现代化与中国社会工作与社会政策自主知识体系建构研究”子课题“中国式现代化中的社会工作理论创新与发展”(2024JZDZ036)。
摘 要:随着中国式现代化道路的推进和基层治理现代化步伐的加快,作为基层治理创新重要力量的中国社会工作亟须从现代化视角审视其专业定位和知识范式。通过比较现代化视角下中西方社会工作发展历程可以发现,两者都依赖现代化进程的推动以及人们对良性社会和生活秩序的渴望,都经历了从环境适应到社会关系改善再到生活关系调整三个阶段的专业探索。不同的是,中国社会工作是站在生活秩序重建的现代化发展新阶段建构实践知识范式的,它依据多元哲学视角,在日益疏离的社会关系中实现人与环境内外互促的个人自主成长。这是一种关注个人自主能力提升的社会工作治理范式,而不同于在注重环境适应的现代化初期由西方专业社会工作创建的注重事务问题解决的帮扶范式。这种治理范式不仅能够找回在过度标准化的现代化进程中丢失的个人自主理性,而且能够展现中国作为后发国家对多元现代化的诉求,以及社会工作在基层治理中促进人的现代化的独特作用。With the advancement of Chinese path to modernization and the acceleration of the modernization of grass-roots governance,social work in China,as an important force of grass-roots governance innovation,needs to examine its specialty orientation and knowledge paradigm from the perspective of modernization.By comparing the development process of social work between China and the West from the perspective of modernization,it is found that both rely on the promotion of modernization process and people's desire for a benign society circulation and life order,and both have experienced three stages of professional exploration from environmental adaptation to the improvement of social relations to the adjustment of life relationship.The difference is that Chinese social work constructs the intellectual paradigm of practice in the new stage of modernization of life order reconstruction,and realizes the independent growth of people and the environment in the increasingly alienated social relations based on multiple philosophical perspectives.This is a governance paradigm of social work that concentrates on improving individual autonomy,completely different from the pro-problem solving paradigm created by Western professional social work in the early modernization period as the core concern of environmental adaptation.This governance paradigm can not only recover the individual autonomy lost in the process of over-standardized modernization,but also show the diversified modernization demands of China,a later-developing country,and the unique role of social work in promoting human modernization in grass-roots governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.109.25