隐逸空间中的东晋侨旧矛盾——从《真诰》的一则材料说起  

The Contradictions between the Refugees and the Aborigines in the Seclusion Space in the Eastern Jin Dynasty:Discussing from a Material of Zhen Gao

作　　者：李奥 Li Ao

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学国学院

出　　处：《国学学刊》2024年第4期79-92,141,共15页Research in the Traditions of Chinese Culture

摘　　要：王羲之与道士许迈的交游本是一段佳话,然而出自许迈之弟许谧等人之手、陶弘景编撰的道教上清派经典《真诰》,在述及冥界职官时,却将王羲之收系禁中,接受惩罚,道教文献中亦存数条史料足以证明许迈因为王羲之而受到牵连。为解释这一问题,本文从隐逸空间的角度分析门阀名士与道教人物的冲突本质。侨旧士人的隐逸空间可以分为实践空间与观念空间,实践空间包括人际关系网络与隐逸的具体生活条件,观念空间涵盖了隐逸过程中的身体感知与洞天仙馆想象。王羲之的复杂身份使他游走于两种空间之间,从而导致杨羲与许谧、许翙对他感到不满,最终在《真诰》的观念空间中让他接受惩罚。这一文本上的冲突实为东晋时期侨旧矛盾在实践空间与观念空间层面的体现。Wang Xizhi's friendship with Taoist Xu Mai is a good story.However,in the Taoist Shangqing School classic Zhen Gao,which was written by Xu Mi and others,compiled by Tao Hongjing,Wang Xizhi was banned and punished when narrating the underworld officials.Several historical materials in Taoist literature are enough to prove that Xu Mai was implicated because of Wang Xizhi.In order to explain this problem,the present paper explains the essence of the conflict between the powerful celebrities and Taoist characters from the perspective of seclusion space.The seclusion spaces of the refugees and the aborigines can be divided into practical space and conceptual space.The practical space includes the interpersonal relationship network and the specific living conditions of seclusion.The conceptual space covers the body perception and the imagination of the cave in the process of seclusion.Wang Xizhi's complex identity made him wander between the two spaces,which led to Yang Xi,Xu Mi and Xu Hui's dissatisfaction with him,and finally let him accept punishment in the conceptual space of Zhen Gao.The conflict in this text is actually the embodiment of the contradiction between the refugees and the aborigines in the Eastern Jin Dynasty at the level of practical space and conceptual space.

关 键 词：东晋名士 早期道教 隐逸 空间 侨旧矛盾 

分 类 号：I20[文学—中国文学]