巴黎奥运会男子4×100 m混合泳接力决赛成绩与技战术分析  

Final Results and Technical and Tactical Analysis of Men's 4×100m Medley Swimming Relay at the Paris Olympics

作　　者：谭浩洁 Tan Haojie(School of Physical Education,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学体育学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《体育科技文献通报》2024年第12期9-12,8,共5页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology

摘　　要：本文采用文献资料法、数理统计法、录像分析法等研究方法,对巴黎奥运会男子4×100 m m混合泳项目中前3名队伍的决赛成绩和技战术进行对比分析。结果显示:(1)在交接棒时间上法国队最快,中国队次之,美国队最后;(2)在跳发技术上,3支队伍均采用了新型跨步入水技术;(3)在战术上,3支队伍均采用了“分权夺标”战术,中国队和美国队采用了“先发制人”战术,法国队采用了“后发制人”战术;(4)中国队蝶泳棒次较弱、仰泳项目缺乏人才储备,自由泳和蛙泳棒次较强。建议:(1)提升游泳后备人才储备;(2)提高游泳项目的科学化训练水平;(3)扬长避短,提升优势项目的同时,补缺劣势项目;(4)高度重视运动员的身心健康和安全保障。This study adopts literature research method,mathematical statistics,and video analysis to conduct a comparative analysis of the final results and technical and tactical performances of the top three teams in the men's 4×100m medley swimming relay event at the Paris Olympics.The results reveal that:(1)In terms of the baton-pass time,the French team was the fastest,followed by the Chinese team,and the American team was the slowest.(2)Regarding the diving start technique,all three teams adopted the new step-in water-entry technique.(3)In terms of tactics,all three teams employed the"divide and conquer"tactic.The Chinese and American teams adopted the"strike first"tactic,while the French team adopted the"wait and strike"tactic.(4)The Chinese team was relatively weak in the butterfly stroke leg and lacked talent reserves in the backstroke event,but was relatively strong in the freestyle and breaststroke legs.Suggestions:(1)Enhance the reserve of swimming talents.(2)Elevate the scientific training level of swimming events.(3)Capitalize on strengths and make up for weaknesses to improve both dominant and disadvantaged events.(4)Attach great importance to the physical and mental health and safety guarantee of athletes.

关 键 词：巴黎奥运会 4×100 m混合泳接力 决赛成绩 技战术分析 

分 类 号：G861.1[文化科学—体育训练]