《大地》与《地之子》对“乡土中国”的差异书写  

The Writing Differences Between The Good Earth and The Son of the Earth on"Rural China"

作　　者：张媛[1] 陈铃 ZHANG Yuan;CHEN Ling(Schools of Foreign Languages,Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,Zhenjiang Jiangsu 212100,China)

机构地区：[1]江苏科技大学外国语学院,江苏镇江212100

出　　处：《江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期69-75,共7页Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目“文化身份视阈下的赛珍珠接受研究”(2019SJA1921);江苏省研究生科研创新实践活动项目“赛珍珠与台静农笔下的‘乡土中国’——以《大地》和《地之子》为例”(KYCX21_3413)。

摘　　要：以农耕文明为代表的中国社会呈现出典型的乡土性。赛珍珠的《大地》和台静农的《地之子》都将目光聚焦到中国农村,从民俗风情、农民形象以及社会情态三个方面生动再现了20世纪初的“乡土中国”。《大地》描绘出了原生态村落的生机与活力,《地之子》勾勒的乡村世界却处处透着哀婉与凄凉。文化身份的不同造就了两位作者对“乡土中国”的书写差异,从而在创作视角、对农民的情感态度以及表现形式等方面折射出迥然不同的文化价值取向。Chinese society,represented by agricultural civilization,presents a typical localism.Pearl Buck′s The Good Earth and Tai Jingnong′s The Son of the Earth both focus on the rural area,vividly reproduce the"Rural China"in the early 20 th century in terms of folk customs,peasant images and social attitudes.The rural life in The Good Earth is full of vitality and energy,while the rural world depicted in The Son of the Earth is full of sadness and grief.The difference in cultural identities has resulted in the two authors′different writings on"Rural China",which reflect divergent cultural value orientations in terms of their creative perspectives,emotional attitudes towards the peasants and forms of expression.

关 键 词：《大地》 《地之子》 乡土中国 情感书写 

分 类 号：I106.4[文学—世界文学]