再议“名动包含”理论存在的逻辑问题  

Further Discussion on the Logical Issues of the“Noun-Verb Inclusion”Theory

作　　者：常康杰 CHANG Kangjie(Institute for Skilled Talent Development,Zhejiang Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Technician,Yiwu,Zhejiang,322009,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江省机电技师学院技能人才培养研究所,浙江义乌322009

出　　处：《盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版)》2025年第1期97-108,共12页Journal of Yancheng Teachers University(Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：围绕“名动包含”理论是否存在逻辑问题这一论题,从东西方逻辑学传统比较、逻辑三段论推导、形式语法学句式分析、句法分布特征分析等角度分析,指出“名动包含”理论存在逻辑问题。进而提出现有争论并未涉及动词作主宾语所需的关键条件,在探讨动词名物化过程的同时,需要重点关注汉语中哪些类型的动词允许其他动词做其主宾语,由此为汉语词类研究提供新的视角。This paper explores the logical problems associated with the theory of“noun-verb inclusion”from various perspectives,including a comparison between Eastern and Western logical traditions,the logical syllogism,syntactic analysis,and syntactic distribution features.It is suggested that the current debate does not address the key conditions required for verbs to serve as subjects and objects.In examining the nominalization of verbs,it is necessary to focus on which types of verbs in Chinese allow other verbs to act as their subjects and objects,thereby providing a new perspective for the study of word classes in Chinese.

关 键 词：名动包含理论 甲乙分立 东西方逻辑 逻辑三段论 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]