检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王敏钊 Wang Minzhao
机构地区:[1]清华大学社会科学学院国际关系学系
出 处:《日本侵华南京大屠杀研究》2024年第4期63-77,142,143,共17页Journal of Japanese Invasion of China and Nanjing Massacre
摘 要:九一八事变以后,如何重建东三省崩溃的秩序、稳定伪满政权的根基、获得民众对其统治的服从,成为日本殖民当局政治宣传急需解决的问题。而日控报刊正是日本在伪满洲国传播政治思想、影响民众观念的重要工具。日本殖民当局通过《盛京时报》《满洲日日新闻》等报刊建构伪满洲国“合法性”。面向东三省中、日两社群,在“满”日控报刊分别使用了“实惠之国”和“理想之国”两种截然不同甚至相互矛盾的“合法性”建构叙事。这种分裂的“合法性”建构叙事不仅使得伪满洲国“合法性”脆弱不堪,更进一步加深了中、日社群间民族认同的分裂,为中、日两国战争记忆的分歧埋下了伏笔。After the outbreak of the September 18 th Incident,how to rebuild the collapsed order in the three northeast provinces,stabilize the foundations of the Puppet Manchukuo regime,and obtain the obedience of the people became a pressing problem that needed to be solved in political propaganda of the Japanese colonial authorities.And the Japanese-controlled newspapers were an important tool for Japan to disseminate political ideas and influence people's views in Manchukuo.The Japanese colonial authorities constructed the“legitimacy”of Manchukuo through newspapers such as the Shengjing Shibao and the Manshūnichinichi Shimbun within local Chinese and Japanese communities,using two completely different and even contradictory“legitimacy”construction narratives of“A Profitable State”versus“An Ideal State”.These divided narratives of the“legitimacy”construction not only made the“legitimacy”of Manchukuo fragile,but also further deepened the existing division of national identity between the local Chinese and Japanese communities,led to the divergence of war memories between China and Japan.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222