刑法治理体育腐败犯罪的三重维度:现象、本质与规制  

The Three Dimensions of Criminal Law Governing Sports Corruption Crime:Phenomenon,Essence,and Regulation

作　　者：谭健强 田玉潇 TANG Jian-qiang;TIAN Yu-xiao

机构地区：[1]北京理工大学法学院,北京100081 [2]中央民族大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《五邑大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期55-59,93,共6页Journal of Wuyi University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：刑法治理是体育腐败犯罪最具威慑力的措施,可从现象、本质与规制三重纬度解剖。在现象解剖上,体育腐败犯罪是竞技比赛主体为谋求不当利益,违背体育运动规则,做出违法操控或干预竞技比赛的行为,包括贿赂型操纵比赛和非贿赂型操纵比赛。“妨害兴奋剂管理罪”的确立,形成体育腐败犯罪三元治理模式。在本质属性上,体育腐败面临行刑衔接不畅和规范供给阙如的难题。在路径规制上,既要修正《体育法》,使之实现与《刑法》之间的衔接,又要完善体育腐败犯罪的规范体系。Criminal law governance is the most powerful deterrent for sports corruption crimes,which can be analyzed from three dimensions:phenomenon,essence,and regulation.In terms of phenomenological analysis,sports corruption crimes refer to the illegal manipulation or intervention of sports competitions by the operators of the competition in order to seek improper benefits,and the violation of the rules of sports,including bribery-and non-bribery-based manipulation.The establishment of the crime of obstructing doping control has formed a threepronged governance model for sports corruption crimes.In essence,sports corruption is faced with the difficult problem of poor connection between execution and lack of standard supply.In terms of path regulation,it is necessary to revise the connection between the Sports Law and the Criminal Law,as well as to improve the regulatory system for sports corruption crimes.

关 键 词：体育腐败 行刑衔接 竞技体育 操纵体育比赛 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学] D9[文化科学—体育学]