社区议事如何在基层共治创新中实现“作用迸发”——基于互动仪式链的双元案例研究  

How Community Deliberation Achieves a“Burst of Effect”in Grassroots Co-Governance Innovation——Dual Case Study Based on Interactive Ritual Chain

作　　者：何继新 刘怡辰 HE Ji-xin;LIU Yi-chen(School of Economics and Management,Tianjin Chengjian University,Tianjin 300384,China)

机构地区：[1]天津城建大学经济与管理学院,天津300384

出　　处：《山东行政学院学报》2025年第1期93-104,共12页Journal of Shandong Academy of Governance

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“低龄老年人参与城市基层治理共同体建设的行为选择及其促进机制研究”(22BSH125)。

摘　　要：在加快推进基层社会治理现代化进程下,社区议事成为基层社会共建、共治、共享的关键议题。选择X社区“议事促共治”和Y社区“党群议事院”两个典型社区基层民主协商的共治创新案例,基于互动仪式链的元理论框架研究发现,社区议事的共治创新过程可划分为传统发展期、措施实施期和创新转型期3个时序区间,且不同阶段的互动情境、互动符号和互动情感存在显著差异;异质化的主导制度逻辑和互动要素构成衍生出“居民自发型模式”和“反馈促进型模式”两种差异化的基层共治模式;不同基层共治模式通过识别与调整互动符号、情境和情感,可以经由“社民互动共治跃迁路径”和“双侧并行共治跃迁路径”向更高程度的“互动共治型模式”转型。With the acceleration of the modernization process of grassroots social governance,community deliberation has become a key aspect of grassroots co-construction,co-governance,and shared benefits.Using the meta-theoretical framework of the interactive ritual chain,the process of co-governance innovation in community deliberation can be divided into three stages:The traditional development period,the implementation period of measures,and the innovation transformation period.Significant differences exist in the interactive situations,symbols,and emotions across stages.The dominant institutional logic and interactive elements of heterogeneity give rise to two distinct grassroots co-governance models:The“resident-initiated model”and the“feedback-driven model”.By identifying and adjusting interactive symbols,contexts,and emotions,different grassroots co-governance models can evolve into a higher form of“interactive co-governance”through the“social-civilian interactive co-governance transition path”and the“bilateral parallel co-governance path”.

关 键 词：社区议事 民主协商 基层共治 基层治理共同体 互动仪式链 

分 类 号：D669.3[政治法律—政治学]