检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹怡[1] Yin Yi
出 处:《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第1期199-205,238,239,共9页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
摘 要:方法论是中国刑法学自主知识体系建构的关键要素,教科书是知识体系的重要载体。以1979年《中华人民共和国刑法》实施至今的代表性教科书为观察对象,运用“德尔菲法”考察中国刑法学在不同历史发展阶段的理论样态,发现中国的刑法学共同体始终是以移植国外的概念工具、理论框架来解释中国刑法,进而搭建刑法学知识体系的。尽管学术界历来有着“法学知识本土化”的声音和努力,并且在“中国自主知识体系建构”的呼吁下得到加强,但从整体来看,仍然存在“自主性”的投入力度不足、发展路径模糊等问题,没有深入贯彻“与中国具体实际、中华优秀传统文化相结合”的发展要求。因而,应“以中国为中心、以本土为方法”,增强自主研究主体意识。The current research paradigm in Chinese criminal jurisprudence primarily revolves around “ comparative research”,and most domestic criminal law scholars have invariably adopted a student-like posture in introducing foreign theoretical discourse,making it difficult for local theoretical discourse to go global.In the process of building an independent knowledge system of criminal jurisprudence,China needs to gradually extricate itself from dependence on foreign theories and establish indigenous,authoritative,and explanatory criminal law theories using its own vocabulary and materials.As an important carrier of criminal jurisprudence theories,textbooks of criminal jurisprudence mark the completeness and autonomy of a country's criminal law theory.This paper takes textbooks from the implementation of the Criminal Law in 1979 to the present as the observation object,and employs the Delphi method to examine the theoretical patterns of Chinese scholarship in different historical development stages.It is found that there are still two major issues within the knowledge system of Chinese criminal jurisprudence.Firstly,the production and creation of the knowledge system of Chinese criminal jurisprudence are still limited to the path of transplantation and reference,and have not demonstrated sufficient autonomy.Secondly,it has yet to diverge from the academic path of treating the ideologies and systems of the former Soviet Union,Germany,Japan,Britain,and the United States as the standard.Although some scholars have reflected on this process,a “self-centered” value orientation has not yet taken shape.Furthermore,this paper proposes to construct an independent knowledge system of Chinese criminal jurisprudence from four aspects.First,we must return to the subject consciousness and promote the actual development of Chinese society and the construction of the rule of law,with the ultimate goal of solving practical problems in China.We must focus on building a legal discourse system with Chinese characteristics and promo
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222