机构地区:[1]Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University(The Fifth Hospital of Wuhan),Wuhan 430050,Hubei Province,China [2]Jianghan University,Wuhan 430050,Hubei Province,China [3]Department of Endocrinology,The Fifth Hospital of Wuhan,Wuhan 430050,Hubei Province,China [4]Department of Anorectal Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University,Zhanjiang 524001,Guangdong Province,China [5]Department of Emergency Medical Center,Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University,Zhanjiang 524001,Guangdong Province,China [6]Department of Oncology,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University(The Fifth Hospital of Wuhan),Wuhan 430050,Hubei Province,China [7]Department of Nursing,Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University,Zhanjiang 524001,Guangdong Province,China
出 处:《World Journal of Diabetes》2025年第2期246-256,共11页世界糖尿病杂志(英文)
基 金:Hubei Province Top Medical Youth Talent Program,Wuhan Knowledge Innovation Special Basic Research Project,No.2023020201020558;Clinical Research Project of Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University,No.LCYJ2021B004 and No.LCYJ2019B010;Science and Technology Plan Project of Zhanjiang,No.2022A01191.
摘 要:BACKGROUND Diabetic foot ulcers(DFUs)present a significant clinical challenge due to their high prevalence and profound impact on morbidity.Ultrasound-assisted wound debridement(UAWD)has emerged as a potential therapeutic modality to improve healing outcomes in DFU management.AIM To evaluate the efficacy of UAWD in treating DFUs on wound closure rates,treatment duration,and quality of life outcomes.METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines,systematically searching PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,and the Cochrane Library with no date restrictions.Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)that evaluated the efficacy of UAWD in DFU treatment were included.Data were independently extracted by two reviewers,with discrepancies resolved through consensus or third-party consultation.The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool.χ2 and I2 statistics assessed heterogeneity,informing the use of fixed or random-effects models for meta-analysis,supplemented by sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment through funnel plots and Egger's test.RESULTS From 1255 articles,seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria.The studies demonstrated that UAWD significantly reduced DFU healing time(standardized mean difference=-0.78,95%CI:-0.97 to-0.60,P<0.001)and increased healing rates(odds ratio=9.96,95%CI:5.99 to 16.56,P<0.001)compared to standard care.Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of these results,and no significant publication bias was detected.CONCLUSION UAWD is a promising adjunctive treatment for DFUs,significantly reducing healing times and increasing healing rates.These findings advocate for the integration of UAWD into standard DFU care protocols.
关 键 词:Diabetic foot ulcers Ultrasound-assisted wound debridement Healing time Healing rates META-ANALYSIS
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...