检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈陶 CHEN Tao(Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Network Investigational Technology,Hunan Police Academy,Changsha 410138,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南警察学院网络侦查技术湖南省重点实验室,湖南长沙410138
出 处:《中国人民公安大学学报(自然科学版)》2024年第4期56-61,共6页Journal of People’s Public Security University of China(Science and Technology)
摘 要:为了评估现行差异化安检措施在试点机场具体实施中的效果,进一步优化其运作效率,采用数据包络分析框架下的考虑非期望产出的超效率SBM模型,对差异化安检通道及常规安检通道的安全检查效率进行了系统性评估。评价结果发现,易安检通道的实施能够切实提高安检的有效性,但其他差异化安检通道的实施并未达到预期。通过对比分析发现,要使差异化安检策略充分实现提升安全性与效率的目标,必须综合考量包括机场运营环境、旅客特征以及安检人员素质在内的多种因素。To evaluate the effectiveness of current differentiated security check measures in pilot airports and further optimize their operational efficiency, the security check efficiency of both differentiated and conventional security lanes are systematically evaluated by using a super-efficiency SBM model within the DEA framework, which considers non-desired outputs. The evaluation results demonstrate that the implementation of easy security lanes can significantly improve the effectiveness of security check. While the implementation of other differentiated security lanes has not reached expectations. Comparative analysis reveals that to fully achieve the goals of enhancing security and efficiency through differentiated security strategies, it is necessary to comprehensively consider multiple factors, including the airport operational environment, passenger characteristics, and the quality of security personnel.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43