大国博弈、议程设置与东盟护持“中心地位”的实践  

Great Power Rivalry,Agenda Setting,and ASEAN’s Practice of Maintaining Its Centrality

作　　者：张洁[1,2] 唐晴 ZHANG Jie;TANG Qing(National Institute of International Strategy,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,100007;School of International Politics and Economics,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,102488)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院亚太与全球战略研究院 [2]中国社会科学院大学国际政治经济学院 [3]中国社会科学院亚太与全球战略研究院东南亚研究中心

出　　处：《云南社会科学》2025年第1期1-9,共9页Social Sciences in Yunnan

基　　金：中国社会科学院登峰战略优势学科“中国周边研究”(项目号:2023DFYSQQY01)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在亚太地区秩序深度调整的进程中,东盟“中心地位”面临严峻挑战,突出表现为东盟对一系列地区机制的主导权被削弱。为此,东盟试图提升战略自主性,护持自身“中心地位”。以东盟地区论坛为例,研究发现,面对东盟地区论坛因大国博弈从过去聚焦非传统安全治理、推进区域合作转变为关注传统安全议题、弱化安全治理合作的变化,东盟通过强化论坛的机制建设、议程设置、主席声明形成等多种途径,引导东盟地区论坛重新聚焦非传统安全合作,将关键性安全议题纳入议程设置并更多施加东盟观点的影响,从而较为成功地重塑了“中心地位”,并在协调大国关系、维系区域合作中持续发挥不可替代的重要作用。When profoundly adjusting the Asia-Pacific regional order,ASEAN centrality faces severe challenges,prominently reflected in the weakening of ASEAN’s leadership over a series of regional mechanisms.In response,ASEAN has sought to enhance its strategic autonomy to maintain its centrality.Taking the ASEAN Regional Forum(ARF)as a case,this study finds that,facing the ARF’s shift from focusing on non-traditional security governance and promoting regional cooperation to prioritizing traditional security issues and diminishing security governance cooperation due to great power rivalry,ASEAN has adopted various approaches,such as strengthening the forum’s institutional framework,agenda-setting,and chair statements,to guide the ARF to focusing on non-traditional security cooperation.By incorporating critical security issues into the agenda and amplifying ASEAN perspectives,ASEAN has relatively successfully reasserted its centrality,continuing to play an indispensable role in coordinating great power relations and maintaining regional cooperation.

关 键 词：东盟“中心地位” 大国博弈 东盟地区论坛 议程设置 

分 类 号：D815[政治法律—国际关系]