经济纠纷案件中警察介入的权责争议探析——从“王平诉启东市公安局不履行法定职责案”谈起  

Probe Into The Controversy Over Police Duties Of Involvement In Disputed Economic Cases——Beginning With The“Wang Ping’s Lawsuit Against Qidong Municipal Public Security Bureau for Not Performing Its Statutory Duties”

作　　者：吴向芸 Wu Xiangyun(Shanghai Police College,Shanghai 200137,China)

机构地区：[1]上海公安学院,上海200137

出　　处：《上海公安学院学报》2024年第6期36-42,共7页Journal of Shanghai Police College

摘　　要：经济纠纷中,公安机关与司法裁判之间对警察介入职责范围存在分歧,引发执法实践混乱。由于现阶段民事社会主体之间力量悬殊,将警察权排除介入经济纠纷已不再契合“服务型政府”理念,亦已无法满足“守护者”形象的公众社会期待。警察权的介入标志应以“风险论”代替“结果论”,介入时应秉持积极辅助原则,构建风险认定体系,并适当引入举证责任倒置。In economic disputes,police agencies and judicial adjudication agencies have discrepancy over the duty scope of police intervention,which contributes to contradictory law enforcement practice.Considering the power disparity between civil social subjects at the current stage,it no longer suits the concept of"service-oriented government"to exclude police power from intervening in economic disputes,and can no longer meet the public expectation that police are their"guardians".The sign of police intervention power should be based on"risk theory"instead of"result theory",and the active auxiliary principle should be upheld in the intervention,the risk identification system should be established,and the responsibility of collecting evidence should be introduced appropriately.

关 键 词：经济纠纷 警察权 公安机关 风险行政 举证责任 

分 类 号：D631[政治法律—政治学]