检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑启福[1] 吴晨霖 ZHENG Qifu;WU Chenlin(Law School,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350108,China)
出 处:《德州学院学报》2025年第1期47-51,63,共6页Journal of Dezhou University
基 金:福建省社会科学规划项目“网络空间命运共同体中的金融数据安全法律问题研究”(FJ2023B075)。
摘 要:数据加工者是数据从产生到流通共享的重要媒介,学界通过物权、债权、知识产权和新型财产权等对数据加工者权利进行配置的认识,均存在一定不足。财产权劳动价值理论在我国法律领域适用已久,本质上是公共资源在人类社会分配过程中兼具公平与效率的方式,应当以此对数据权利进行配置。依照投入劳动的不同,将数据加工者权利二分,以著作权及合同权利分别配置,同时以自愿性登记作为权利的凭证。Data processors are an important intermediary in the generation and circulation of data.The academic community has allocated rights to data through property rights,contractual rights,intellectual property rights,and new types of property rights,but there are certain shortcomings.The labor theory of property rights has been applied in the legal field for a long time,and its essence is a way of allocating public resources in human society that combines fairness and efficiency.It should be used to allocate data rights.According to the different types of labor input,the rights of data processors are divided into two categories,with copyright and contractual rights being allocated separately,and voluntary registration being us ed as proof of rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62