乡村振兴视域下农村风险治理结构:框架、问题与消弭  

Rural Risk Governance Structure from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization:Framework,Problems and Elimination

作　　者：吴长剑[1] WU CHang-jian(School of Public Management,Huaiyin Normal University,Huaian Jiangsu 223001,China)

机构地区：[1]淮阴师范学院公共管理学院,江苏淮安223001

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第1期28-31,40,共5页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目:全过程人民民主中的民主监督理论研究(22BKS077);江苏省大学生创新创业训练计划项目:乡村振兴视域下农村风险治理结构创新研究(202410323131Y)。

摘　　要：随着风险社会的冲击,农村风险治理结构问题愈发成为影响我国乡村振兴高质量发展的关键变量,对其展开系统考察,已成为当前本土研究的一个前沿议题。在文献述评和六维分析框架建构基础上,发现当前我国乡村振兴下农村风险治理结构存在着风险治理理念薄弱、主体割裂、内容碎片、路径单向、过程局部、效果应急等问题,引发一系列消极后果。通过风险治理的理念赋能化、主体合作化、内容整体化、路径多向化、过程全程化、效果常态化等消弭策略,可以有效实现乡村振兴下农村风险治理结构优化。With the impact of the risk society,the issue of rural risk governance structure has become a key variable affecting the high-quality development of rural revitalization in China.Conducting a systematic examination of it has become a cutting-edge topic in current local research.Based on literature review and six dimensional analysis framework construction,it is found that the current rural risk governance structure under rural revitalization in China has problems such as weak risk governance concepts,separated subjects,fragmented content,one-way paths,partial processes,and emergency effects,which have brought about a series of negative consequences.The optimization of rural risk governance structure under rural revitalization can be achieved effectively through the empowerment of risk governance concepts,subject cooperation,overall content,multi-directional paths,full process,and normalized effects.

关 键 词：风险社会 乡村振兴 农村场域 风险治理结构 治理现代化 

分 类 号：D422.6[政治法律—政治学] D630[政治法律—国际共产主义运动]