不同剂量艾司氯胺酮复合丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳用于无痛胃肠镜检查术的效果观察  

Effect of different doses of esketamine combined with propofol medium and long chain fat emulsion on painless gastroenteroscopy

作　　者：方志勇 邢凡 毛萍静 胡建 Fang Zhiyong;Xing Fan;Mao Pingjing;Hu Jian(Department of Anesthesiology,Lishui People’s Hospital(Zhongda Hospital Lishui Branch,Southeast University),Nanjing,Jiangsu 211200,China)

机构地区：[1]南京市溧水区人民医院(东南大学附属中大医院溧水分院)麻醉科,江苏南京211200

出　　处：《中国内镜杂志》2025年第1期65-73,共9页China Journal of Endoscopy

基　　金：2020年度南京市卫生科技发展专项资金项目计划(No:YKK20180)。

摘　　要：目的评估在无痛胃肠镜检查术中,不同剂量的艾司氯胺酮复合丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳的应用效果。方法选取2022年1月-2023年12月该院接受无痛胃肠镜检查术的患者144例,随机分为4组,各36例。其中,A组、B组和C组艾司氯胺酮的负荷剂量依次为0.2、0.3和0.4 mg/kg,D组不使用艾司氯胺酮,给予等容量生理盐水作为对照。所有患者在检查过程中均使用丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳进行麻醉镇静。分别于入室建立心电监护后即刻(T0)、检查开始前即刻(T1)、胃镜置入即刻(T2)、肠镜检查前即刻(T3)、肠镜置入即刻(T4)和检查结束即刻(T5),记录4组患者心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)和经皮动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2)。比较4组患者丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳用量、苏醒时间和离院时间。分别于T0和苏醒时(T6)对患者进行40项恢复质量评分量表(QoR-40)评估。比较4组不良反应发生情况。结果4组患者HR、MAP和SpO2的时间效应比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=3.91、21.65、6.17,P<0.05)。4组患者HR、MAP和SpO2的组间效应比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=14.57、7.14、30.34,P<0.05)。A组、B组、C组与D组的SpO2交互效应有差异(F=2.88,P<0.05)。4组患者丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳的首次用量和总用量,以及苏醒时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。其中,A组、B组和C组丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳的首次用量和总用量明显少于D组,且B组和C组明显少于A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但B组和C组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组和B组苏醒时间明显短于C组和D组,且C组长于D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A组与B组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4组患者离院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4组患者T6时点QoR-40量表总分明显低于T0时点,B组T6时点QoR-40量表总分明显高于A组、C组和D组,且A组和C组明显高于D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A组和C组比较,差异无统计学�Objective To evaluate the effect of different doses of esketamine combined with propofol medium and long chain fat emulsion in painless gastroenteroscopy.Methods 144 patients who were scheduled to receive painless gastroenteroscopy from January 2022 to December 2023 were randomly divided into four groups with 36 cases in each group.The load dose of esketamine in group A,group B and group C was 0.2,0.3 and 0.4 mg/kg respectively,and group D was treated with equivalent normal saline instead of esketamine as the control.All the patients were administrated with propofol medium and long chain fat emulsion during the examination.Heart rate(HR),mean arterial pressure(MAP)and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation(SpO2)were recorded immediately after electrocardiograph monitoring was established(T0),immediately before examination(T1),immediately after gastroscopy placement(T2),immediately before colonoscopy(T3),immediately after colonoscopy implantation(T4)and immediately after examination(T5).The dosage of propofol medium and long chain fat emulsion,recovery time and discharge time were compared among the four groups.Patients were assessed with quality of recovery-40 questionnaire(QoR-40)at T0 and at wake time(T6).The adverse reactions of the four groups were compared.Results There were statistically significant differences in the temporal effects of HR,MAP and SpO2 among the 4 groups(F=3.91,21.65,6.17,P<0.05);There were statistically significant differences in the intergroup effects of HR,MAP and SpO2 among the 4 groups(F=14.57,7.14,30.34,P<0.05).The variation trend of SpO2 in groups A,B,C and D was statistically significant(F=2.88,P<0.05).The first and total dosage of propofol medium and long chain fat emulsion,and the recovery time of the four groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).The initial dosage and total dosage of propofol medium and long chain fat emulsion in group A,group B and group C were significantly lower than those in group D(P<0.05),and group B and group C were significantly lower than group A(

关 键 词：艾司氯胺酮 血流动力学 丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳 无痛胃肠镜检查术 内镜技术 麻醉 

分 类 号：R614.2[医药卫生—麻醉学]