假托与重构:《禹贡》冀州与有夏之墟  

Assumption and Reconstruction:Jizhou and the Ruins of the Xia Dynasty in Yu Gong

作　　者：周书灿[1] Zhou Shucan

机构地区：[1]苏州大学社会学院,江苏苏州215123

出　　处：《中原文化研究》2025年第1期121-128,共8页The Central Plains Culture Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“新中国成立以来中国文明起源研究的话语体系构建研究”(23AZS001)。

摘　　要：战国秦汉时期的学者普遍认为,冀州应在河东及两河之间的河内一带,西周春秋时期的晋国所辖区域,即司马迁所说的“天下之中”之地。《禹贡》九州并非按照治水先后排序,宋儒一方面确信《禹贡》为大禹治水的历史文献,另一方面又用大禹时代尚未形成的五行说来解释《禹贡》九州的排列顺序,自相矛盾,疑点重重。20世纪学术界对《禹贡》冀州与夏墟之间关系的探讨,逐渐接近部分历史真相,但仍存在诸多疑惑。大禹传说的发生和流变有一个多元并起与层累积聚的过程。《禹贡》一书是战国时期儒者在魏地禹都等传说基础上重构的一部非纪实著作,一幅治理天下的蓝图,《禹贡》中的山川地理、九州、五服之制,和大禹毫无关系。《禹贡》九州、五服制自然无法和龙山时代的考古学资料相对应。During the Warring States period,Qin and Han Dynasty,scholars generally believed that Jizhou was located in the area between the rivers in Hedong and Henei,which was the territory of Jin State during the Western Zhou and Spring and Autumn Periods.This region was also referred to by Sima Qian as“the center of the world.”The Nine States in Yu Gong are not arranged according to flood control measures,and the Song Confucians believed that Yu Gong was the historical document of Yu the Great controlling the flood,but at the same time used the five element theory which was not developed in that period.This was self-contradictory and full of doubts.In the 20th century,research on the relationship between Jizhou and Xia Ruins in Yu Gong gradually approached some historical truths,but there were still many uncertainties.The occurrence and evolution of the legend of Yu the Great followed a complex process involving multiple interpretations.Yu Gong is a non-documentary work reconstructed by Confucians in the Warring States period on the basis of legends such as Yudu in the state of Wei.It is a blueprint for governance,but the geography of mountains and rivers,the Nine States and Wufu in Yu Gong have no direct connection to Emperor Yu.The Nine States and Wufu in Yu Gong naturally cannot be aligned with the archaeological data of Longshan period.

关 键 词：《禹贡》 冀州 夏墟 魏国 重构 

分 类 号：K221[历史地理—历史学]